Test ID PFGE Bacterial Typing by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)

Useful For
Bacterial typing is useful to investigate infection outbreaks by a single species.
Special Instructions
Method Name
Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis of DNA Fragments
Reporting Name
Bacterial TypingSpecimen Type
VariesContainer/Tube: Agar slant
Specimen Volume: Isolates on separate agar slants in pure culture
Collection Instructions:
1. Organism must be in pure culture, actively growing. Do not submit mixed cultures.
2. Place specimen in a large infectious container (T146) and label as an etiologic agent/infectious substance.
3. Place all pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) specimens (all patients and/or sites to be compared) together in a large bag, and send in the same shipping container. This is necessary for comparison of isolates by this method.
Additional Information:
1. Specimen source and organism identification are required for processing.
2. Each slant must be submitted under a separate order.
3. Original isolates should be saved at the client site if additional PFGE testing may be needed.
4. See Infectious Specimen Shipping Guidelines in Special Instructions for shipping information.
Specimen Stability Information
Specimen Type | Temperature | Time |
---|---|---|
Varies | Ambient (preferred) | |
Refrigerated |
Clinical Information
Bacterial-typing techniques are useful for determining strain relatedness in the setting of nosocomial outbreaks or apparent outbreaks. Serial isolates obtained from the same patient can be typed to determine whether they are the same or different. Typing often allows the physician to discriminate between 2 species, recognize an outbreak, or identify the source of infection.
In the past, strain typing was accomplished by testing for different biochemical, phage, or antibiotic resistance patterns. Antibiograms are often unreliable because they are easy to over-interpret or under-interpret. Other strain-typing methods are often organism-specific and each requires a unique set of reagents and procedures. The availability of classical strain-typing techniques has been limited.
An excellent example of the power of the technique was in the analysis of a large number of clustered isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus obtained from patients and staff at a Mayo Rochester hospital during September and October, 1992. Although the high frequency with which this organism was isolated suggested a nosocomial outbreak, molecular typing of the isolates showed: only 3 of the 14 were identical; the remaining isolates were most likely the result of a surge in the number of random isolates of this organism. Thus, the 14 isolates were not part of a nosocomial epidemic due to a single strain, and radical measures for control of a nosocomial outbreak were unnecessary.
Reference Values
Reported as isolates from these sources are "indistinguishable" or "different" by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Results will be faxed to the client.
Cautions
The fact that 2 strains share the same pattern does not prove that they are epidemiologically related. Establishment of an epidemiologic relationship depends on: the frequency with which the "indistinguishable" pattern is seen among epidemiologically unrelated isolates and correlation with clinical and epidemiological information.
Obviously, if common contact between 2 patients with strains with the same pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) type can be established, the chances are greater that an epidemiologic link can be ascribed. Thus, the greatest power of PFGE typing is in showing strain dissimilarity, not in proving similarity or relatedness.
Day(s) Performed
Monday through Friday; Continuously
Report Available
5 daysPerforming Laboratory

Test Classification
This test uses a standard method. Its performance characteristics were determined by Mayo Clinic in a manner consistent with CLIA requirements.CPT Code Information
87152